Apr 20, 2016

S RV█R MAI TE▄A▬CE

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
$MAIN/HARD/ARCHIVE/1_3.13.13/$ONE
% % % %
 ▐▐▌▬ve█p █ ▄█ n▀ed it is u▬necessari▄y crude we assure you that we are driven by nothing other than concern and urgency. When plainly explained the issue is as follows - our conception of the relation between fields Above and Below is, we believe it is now safe to say, undeniably and completely false. We fully understand the enthusiasm that often follows the development of a new scientific model. The praise our colleagues are treated with is well deserved and we have no intention of undermining it. What we are asking of you is to set this reverie aside for only a moment and consider the analysis this department is putting forward. Our aim is not to defend outdated theories of field equivalence. It is not to gain publicity or stir panic. We merely want to discuss the reasonable possibility of not yet being fully out of danger. As the data collected from within the sealed tunnels shows, malign field activity may in fact be a phenomenon caused by the field Below and n▀▄ a tempor▬ry on▀ █t th▐t.▬
% % % %
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

4 comments:

  1. Outdated theories? These theories cannot be outdated unless found evidence the phenomenon are substantiated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Above and Below -- possibly a reference to the mystical concept of "As Above, So Below." Interestingly, the symbol for this is two triangles, one pointed up, the other pointed down. Perhaps this is the meaning behind the Pyramid shape?

    ReplyDelete
  3. So all the point which as you mention i am totally agreed.
    Thanks for your kind information.
    goldenslot
    gclub
    gclub casino

    ReplyDelete